Linked by David Adams on Sun 8th May 2011 04:47 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 472291
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
But ARM better have a damn good road-map for constant improvements and the ability to manufacturer enough of the chips otherwise there's going to be a lot of pain.
That was one of the reasons Intel won out over AMD. They had a solid road-map with exactly what they were doing and where they were going. And their market share and performance have shown that.
That was one of the reasons Intel won out over AMD. They had a solid road-map with exactly what they were doing and where they were going. And their market share and performance have shown that.
ARM's manufacturing ability (or lack of) is irrelevant.




Member since:
2006-02-01
Apple have never been interested in the lower end market of things.
You can pick a laptop up for say $400 and it's a cheap pile of rubbish, but it will browse the Internet and do emails no worries.
Apple laptop on the other hand is $1400, but at least it's going to last you a good 4 years I've found and it's not going to struggle if you have word an do some light photoshop work and process your photos and make a movie.
If the only benefit is battery life, then a lot of people will leave. Who cares about battery life if you can't do your work properly.
Now if for some reason they can pull of battery life, and better performance than Intel, sounds good. But ARM better have a damn good road-map for constant improvements and the ability to manufacturer enough of the chips otherwise there's going to be a lot of pain.
That was one of the reasons Intel won out over AMD. They had a solid road-map with exactly what they were doing and where they were going. And their market share and performance have shown that.