Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th May 2011 21:46 UTC
Apple Apple has released the source code for WebKit in iOS 4.3, which it had been withholding for eight weeks. However, according yo Jay 'saurik' Freeman, they are still not, and never have been, in compliance with the LGPL. "Apple's provided source code (which /is/ heavily modified for the iPhone) [...] isn't even complete enough to compile (it is missing a bunch of code for the WAK* classes), so Apple has simply never been in compliance with this license," Saurik writes. So, it would seem that Apple is still violating the LGPL, and has been doing so for a very long time. Funny how this never makes it to mainstream technology sites. I guess they find their pre-release review devices more important.
Thread beginning with comment 472429
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Just relax
by JAlexoid on Tue 10th May 2011 00:31 UTC in reply to "Just relax"
JAlexoid
Member since:
2009-05-19

They made WebKit, its 1000x better than the previous yearly code drop that were merged in KHTML before 2006. Apple is usually nice when it come to source code, much more than MS. They have been less and less recently, but who ever used Darwin + X11 as an OS?

They are not nice right now, right but trolling wont help. Sueing and winning against apple will just make things worst, they will sue even more people. It's Apple! Not Oracle or Microsoft. They don't invest in OSS to kill it. They usually do to spread technology (GC, Avahi/ZeroConf/Bonjour/mDNSresponder, CPUS, GCC, FreeBSD (manual backports), ZFS and many more). Even if it don't always end up well and open, I think they do a good job, overall. Remember than WebKit is mostly Apple code. They don't -have- to commit it, they own the copyright, if they want to make WebKit on iOS propriatary fine, they own it. It's ok as all code not owned by them is still available, and it is.


ZFS? You do understand that ZFS is now Oracle's tech?
If WebKit is mostly their code, then they should just find the code that is not theirs and replace it with their own code and be done with the requirement to release any code whatsoever.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Just relax
by Elv13 on Tue 10th May 2011 02:06 in reply to "RE: Just relax"
Elv13 Member since:
2006-06-12

Apple tried to make ZFS more widespread and adopt it in OSX until Oracle bought Sun and said no. That was OpenSource and more than just a copy of Solaris code.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Just relax
by Laurence on Tue 10th May 2011 07:21 in reply to "RE[2]: Just relax"
Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26

Apple tried to make ZFS more widespread and adopt it in OSX until Oracle bought Sun and said no. That was OpenSource and more than just a copy of Solaris code.


Yeah, but Apple didn't contribute anything to ZFS so it's not proving the OSS-friendly point you're trying to make.

Reply Parent Score: 3