To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
A truly OSS skype alternative would indeed be welcome. What are the chances it would retain the POTS bridges though? I frequently use Skype to call long distance to land line numbers. I could actually reverse that and have a land line number that forwards to my local Skype if I wanted.
I do see an OSS version being able to match or improve on Skype to Skype functions. Here's hoping that OSS project can also manage to make a business of it and provide access to POTS lines. I'd be happy to give them my $2.95 a month instead of Microsoft.
Given Hackerspaces and community projects that have managed to setup and provide local ISP services, it's possible. Come on all you Hackerspaces out there; get coding some voip and see if you can make it happen.
I'm sure there are a lot of OSS alternatives to skype. The problems with these alternatives are:
1) Quality - sound and video quality over slow connections made skype so loved. I'm sure though that there are products that offer good quality.
2) Market - Skype is not standard in any way but it is the de facto standard.
The problem with chat and VoIP is that you need a program that is compatible with what your friends are using. And since your friends have other friends and so on, you need to convince a hole market to adopt a new program.
Or at least to convince enough people to try a new chat(VoIP) and have to programs with the same functionality running at the same time.
Edited 2011-05-10 14:54 UTC
via http://jitsi.org
also: http://www.jitsi.org/index.php/Main/Features
Edited 2011-05-10 09:16 UTC
via http://jitsi.org
also: http://www.jitsi.org/index.php/Main/Features "
You've GOT to be kidding? ..written in Java .. consumes 250 MiB with 3 protocols active and 5 users online.. and i thought Skype was bloated crap!
I guess rewriting Pidgin in Java increases memory consumption by a factor 20!
Edited 2011-05-10 10:23 UTC
via http://jitsi.org
also: http://www.jitsi.org/index.php/Main/Features "
Jitsi is nowhere near the same as Skype.
First of all, it relies on 3rd party IM networks and protocol which means it's bound to have days when it's not working because the API got changed. Also, there's the risk that Microsoft/Yahoo/etc. will just lock these alternatives out of their network completely.
Secondly, it doesn't do phonecalls to, you know, actual phones. That's one of the most important selling points of Skype, that it can place regular calls to cell-phones or regular phones anywhere in the world.
Thirdly, it doesn't do SMS messages either. Some people use Skype for that too.
Fourth, it's is an EVEN bigger pig on resources than Skype is. Geesh.
Not available for Linux: http://www.google.com/talk/otherclients.html
Also probably the end of Skype for Android... "
And possibly the end of the iPhone version too. I can just see Apple banning Skype because it directly competes with Facetime, and it's now owned by a direct competitor on top of that. Actually, when you consider Apple's attitude, the Android version is probably more likely to stay alive.





Member since:
2009-03-13
The end of Skype for Linux? ... I suppose my family will have to live without us being able to video chat freely.