To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You're younger than I am, kid.
And you're right about analogies, in general, but in yours in particular, you said that asking whether someone was actually hurt by Apple not releasing source code was "like asking" whether someone was actually hurt by the disaster in Japan. You equated the two.
Just so we're clear: I believe I can safely say at the least that we (and, I think, 99+% of people on osnews.com) are in agreement that, if Apple is legally obliged to release the source code, it should—must, even—do so. That's the legal question, and it's pretty straightforward.
The moral question is of course related, but it's also separate. A more analogous situation, to my mind, would be if my neighbor next door made me some new drapes, which I paid for, and then my neighbor refused to tell the guy down the street how they were made. In what way am I hurt?





Member since:
2011-03-18
That's like asking "Why do you care about the disaster in Japan? Were you there? Do you have family there? Did it harm you in any way?" "
What? Let me get this straight: you're equating massive loss of life, the displacement of tens (hundreds?) of thousands of people, the uncontrolled release of radiation into the environment...with not having the source code for the web browser on your phone. Maybe you should take a walk to clear your head and get some perspective.