Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th May 2011 20:35 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 472706
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by shmerl
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 11th May 2011 21:29
in reply to "RE: Comment by shmerl"
And of course Thom is going to find this to be all ok - this is Google, purveyor of all that is good, wholesome and right in the world...
You're banned forever from now on. This is clearly wrong as anyone who ACTUALLY READ THE GODDAMN 435743965 ARTICLES I HAVE WRITTEN ON THIS SUBJECT WOULD KNOW. I'm SO sick of your continuous and clearly wrong accusations about me.
Edited 2011-05-11 21:30 UTC
RE[3]: Comment by shmerl
by Finchwizard on Wed 11th May 2011 22:22
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by shmerl"
RE[3]: Comment by shmerl
by hackus on Wed 11th May 2011 22:31
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by shmerl"
RE[3]: Comment by shmerl
by Laurence on Thu 12th May 2011 09:38
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by shmerl"
RE[3]: Comment by shmerl
by flypig on Thu 12th May 2011 11:58
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by shmerl"
You're banned forever from now on.
I don't tend to agree with mrhasbean's comments, and I can understand your frustration at being accused of bias, but it's a shame if you think it's necessary to ban.
Apart from the attacks on other people's judgement (which are wholly unnecessary), mrhasbean tends to express valid opinions (they appear to be genuinely held, even if they're not true), and personally I like to see the other side of the argument put forcefully at times.
I'd urge you to reconsider.
RE[3]: Comment by shmerl
by jboss1995 on Thu 12th May 2011 21:01
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by shmerl"





Member since:
2006-04-03
Well you'd think "opensource" would actually mean that the source is openly available wouldn't you, you know, open ... source. Goes to show that if you're under the right license your project can be closed tighter than a fish's rectum and you can still call it opensource.
And of course Thom is going to find this to be all ok - this is Google, purveyor of all that is good, wholesome and right in the world...