Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th May 2011 20:35 UTC
Google It was inevitable, of course, and rightfully so: Google is having its big I/O conference, so we have to talk about the lack of Honeycomb's source code. While not violating any licenses, the lack of source code doesn't sit well with many - including myself - so it only makes sense people are asking Google about it. Andy Rubin confirmed we're never going to see Honeycomb's sources as a standalone release. He also explained what 'open' means for Android.
Thread beginning with comment 472731
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by vivainio
by JAlexoid on Wed 11th May 2011 23:32 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by vivainio"
Member since:

A few complaints directed at Android have been that it is using a different method for handling 'handoffs' (wakelock), and it's rumoured with 3.1 to have a different USB driver stack to Linux.

I'm pretty sure it's the same story as with the scheduler - one size fits all is not always the best approach. And you know that if Linus will not think it's right it'll never get in to the mainline.

Reply Parent Score: 2