Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th May 2011 18:59 UTC, submitted by fran

Thread beginning with comment 473818
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
But you can't do that with proprietary and closed source software. All you can do is urging the developer to release a version for your favourite platform.
That's not the point. To paraphrase: Why should proprietary vendors be held back by the shortcomings of Linux?
Same argument. Open or closed source is immaterial.
Like someone said: the people who write the code gets to decide.
Edited 2011-05-19 22:43 UTC
That's not the point. To paraphrase: Why should proprietary vendors be held back by the shortcomings of Linux?
I never said they should.
Same argument. Open or closed source is immaterial.
Like someone said: the people who write the code gets to decide.
Like someone said: the people who write the code gets to decide.
If you are a developer of proprietary software and decide to not release a Linux version (for whatever reson you might have) and there is no free alternative, some Linux users will complain because they have no choice but to dual boot or try to get it to work under wine.
If gnome decides to drop support a platform however they are not "fscking" their users because if there is enough interest in that platform users can just get the sources and maintain the port themselves.
Member since:
2011-02-11
You are comparing two different things.
You can help port gnome to whatever fringe platform you like. It's free and open source software.
But you can't do that with proprietary and closed source software. All you can do is urging the developer to release a version for your favourite platform. That's why some Linux users complain.