Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th May 2011 18:59 UTC, submitted by fran
Thread beginning with comment 474009
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I have no issue either, and I use closed source software myself. My point is that you are comparing different things.
The comment that started this discussion, I think, is the one that said something like this:
Gnome is a free project and anybody is welcome to port/fork it, so why don't you stop bitching and start coding?
With applications like Photoshop, Linux "whiners" don't have that possibility. And I agree, it is Adobe's decision, but the point is, IF Adobe open sourced it, I really doubt Linux developers would keep complaining instead of coding. If they did, then (and only then) you could talk about double standards.
To not make their applications open source or not is their decision, to support or not support Linux is their decision.
Maybe it's just me but I have no issue with not all software in the world being open source.
Maybe it's just me but I have no issue with not all software in the world being open source.
But you certainly have an issue with Gnome choosing to focus solely on Linux...





Member since:
2010-04-30
They don't have to. Just make them open source (as GNOME is) and Linux developers will happily take care of the rest from there, thank you very much.