Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th May 2011 18:59 UTC, submitted by fran
Thread beginning with comment 474107
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Sad but inevitable
by weorthe on Sun 22nd May 2011 14:37
in reply to "RE[3]: Sad but inevitable"




Member since:
2006-11-18
Shittiest You say ... interesting.
Maximum UFS2 file size is 32 PB while maximum file size for EXT3 is 2 TB only ... and UFS2 is shittiest?
I would like to also hear on which properties You have measured that impressive shittiestness ...
FreeBSD can also do not have to use UFS at all now, it can boot from ZFS pool ... and Linux has nothing even close to what ZFS offers (do not even try to maze unexperienced users with BTRFS).
Linux developers are like monkeys that with infinite amount of time will be able to write works of william shakespeare, so linux developers with infinite amount of time will be able to write PROPERLY DESIGNED and WELL THOUGHT operating system ...