Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th May 2011 20:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 474136
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Patch the User = security != market share
by jabbotts on Sat 21st May 2011 18:19
in reply to "RE[3]: Patch the User = security != market share"
but it's only been recently that anyone cared about the gate you're sitting behind
Well yes, but that gate is not magically more effective now that people take interest in seeing me. The wall and gate is not suddenly more or less secure than it was before. It may attract more attempts now with it's recent popularity but any successful attempts would have been just as successful before.




Member since:
2006-10-10
Small market share is actually obscurity not security.
Obscurity; I hide behind a corner and you can't see me until you walk around the corner. I'm obscured only until you know where to look.
Security; I hide behind a corner but you can't walk around it and see me because you'd have to get through the locked gate between us.
The first provides no real resistance to finding me where the second does provides some form of resistance to your attempts at walking around the corner.
I really wasn't equating their security with obscurity, although that's what all the CLI-kiddies tout as their number one reason why command line is better. My argument is that everyone knew you were around that corner, but it's only been recently that anyone cared about the gate you're sitting behind.