Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Tue 24th May 2011 14:38 UTC, submitted by Debjit
Thread beginning with comment 474336
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yep, my memory serves me right.
From http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/2/247
< odd >.x.x: Linus went crazy, broke absolutely _everything_, and rewrote
the kernel to be a microkernel using a special message-passing version
of Visual Basic. (timeframe: "we expect that he will be released from
the mental institution in a decade or two").
the kernel to be a microkernel using a special message-passing version
of Visual Basic. (timeframe: "we expect that he will be released from
the mental institution in a decade or two").
Yep, my memory serves me right.
From http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/2/247
"< odd >.x.x: Linus went crazy, broke absolutely _everything_, and rewrote
the kernel to be a microkernel using a special message-passing version
of Visual Basic. (timeframe: "we expect that he will be released from
the mental institution in a decade or two").
" From http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/2/247
"< odd >.x.x: Linus went crazy, broke absolutely _everything_, and rewrote
the kernel to be a microkernel using a special message-passing version
of Visual Basic. (timeframe: "we expect that he will be released from
the mental institution in a decade or two").
The current suggestion is 3.0, 3.1 - so this does not contradict the above
[3.0.1 etc stable updates - are not from Linus]




Member since:
2005-08-27
Was linux 3.0 the version that was supposed to be a ground-up rewrite in visual basic that Linus would create in a mental asylum? Kind of remember such a promise from previous versioning schemes...