Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd May 2011 22:13 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 474343
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Four Day Old News
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 24th May 2011 16:02
in reply to "RE[4]: Four Day Old News"
RE[6]: Four Day Old News
by pantheraleo on Tue 24th May 2011 17:07
in reply to "RE[5]: Four Day Old News"
You have not submitted anything in the past two years. Checked our submission archive.
You're right. I haven't. It's probably been about two years since I have spent much time here because the content is just too stale most of the time.
That and you are always politicizing stories as well, which personally I find annoying.




Member since:
2007-03-07
Yes, actually I have. Just not for a long time because I stopped visiting for a long time. There was nothing worth seeing here. The pace of new content slowed way down, and by the time it got posted, it was old news.
Launching a competing site and posting content is the easy part. Getting enough exposure to make it worthwhile is the hard part.
That's not my intent. If Thom wants to do it, I have no desire to take it away from him.
The criticism is perfectly valid because what I said was true. Especially the part about not having new content available on Monday morning when most people are checking for the latest IT news. That has really got to hurt traffic, because again, people check their RSS feed, and it's the same story every time "Nothing new to see here".
I do provide value because I comment. Comments are an important part of a site like this. And as I said, I have contributed content in the past. Just not for awhile.