Linked by Kroc Camen on Wed 1st Jun 2011 19:22 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Oracle and SUN "Today we welcome Oracle's donation of code that has previously been proprietary to the Apache Software Foundation, it is great to see key user features released in a form that can be included into LibreOffice."
Thread beginning with comment 475494
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
pantheraleo
Member since:
2007-03-07

No. Not if they aren't making money from it.


Even if they could make money off of it, it wouldn't be enough for them to be interested in it. It just doesn't fit their overall business strategy.

Reply Parent Score: 2

orestes Member since:
2005-07-06

As much as I loathe Larry Ellison and Oracle, he's no fool when it comes to sound business choices. Pity it took this long for Sun's assets to end up in competent hands.

Reply Parent Score: 5

pantheraleo Member since:
2007-03-07

It is true that it was hard to figure out exactly what Sun was up to in their later years. They went on a massive buying spree of buying up smaller companies, including ones that couldn't possibly benefit them financially, such as StarOffice. The bought up Cobalt Server appliances, tried to sell their server appliances for a little while, and then just discontinued them. They bought up Virtual Box, which was another one of those "why?" moments. Virtual Box is useful for desktop virtualization, but it's not exactly enterprise level server virtualization type stuff.

Sun ended up going massively into debt by going on this buying spree, and the companies it was buying simply didn't seem to provide a lot of benefit to Sun's overall business strategy.

Reply Parent Score: 3