Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 3rd Jun 2011 22:23 UTC, submitted by sawboss
Internet & Networking "One researcher has decided he wants to make Skype open source by reverse engineering the protocol the service uses. In fact, he claims to have already achieved that reverse engineering feat on a new skype-open-source blog. The source code has been posted for versions 1.x/3.x/4.x of Skype as well as details of the rc4 layer arithmetic encoding the service uses."
Thread beginning with comment 476153
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: u really dont get it!
by ikidunot on Mon 6th Jun 2011 01:16 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: u really dont get it!"
ikidunot
Member since:
2011-06-04

Microsoft offers the WLM service to their clients and no one else. It is not a public service like the PSTN.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: u really dont get it!
by Neolander on Mon 6th Jun 2011 05:43 in reply to "RE[4]: u really dont get it!"
Neolander Member since:
2010-03-08

Sure, but if their clients choose to use different client software and Microsoft doesn't feel like it, it's Microsoft's problem, not the client's one.

You said that reverse engineering had no benefit. I have shown you that, from a customer's point of view, there are benefits. Of course, the service provider's opinion may come into play if it successfully tries to keep breaking protocol compatibility and force clients to upgrade, or if it uses legal power to stop other people from using its proprietary protocol. But in principle, reverse engineering the Skype protocol is pure benefit for Skype's users. At worst they lose nothing, at best they get worthwhile Skype implementations on non-supported platforms. It's a win-win situation.

Edited 2011-06-06 05:45 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: u really dont get it!
by 0brad0 on Tue 7th Jun 2011 00:37 in reply to "RE[4]: u really dont get it!"
0brad0 Member since:
2007-05-05

Microsoft offers the WLM service to their clients and no one else. It is not a public service like the PSTN.


Tell that to the many hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of users not using their clients and a majority of them have no means of running their clients even if they could possibly want to.

Reply Parent Score: 2