Linked by lemur2 on Fri 3rd Jun 2011 22:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 476159
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
I have already pointed out that BricsCAD is a perfectly viable alternative to AutoCAD, and that LibreOffice is a perfectly viable alternative to Microsoft Office.
However, CAD is a high-end application that no-one in their right mind would be running on a netbook. As for Pro Tools ... along with MS office, these are applications that one might actually have a use for on a netbook, providing the price was right. But Pro Tools? ... the software alone would cost as much again as the netbook.
Here is a capable solution, software included, for the price of a netbook hardware alone:
http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/indamixx-laptop-is-first-pre-...
Edited 2011-06-06 02:40 UTC