Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 4th Jun 2011 23:39 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 476342
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Geez...I stand corrected. :-)
Wasn't thinking of corporate backroom mainframes but desktop systems, since the topic was Apple, which recently has downsized their OS portfolio to provide end-user solutions only.
You're right, of course. Does not counter the fact that Microsoft has a better compatibility track record than Apple.




Member since:
2005-06-29
Microsoft has maintained backward compatibility on their operating systems better than anyone in the closed-source world.
I suggest that IBM has done the best job, not Microsoft; given that IBM still provides backward compatibility for IBM 360 applications (circa 1964) on their current hardware.