Linked by David Adams on Tue 7th Jun 2011 17:54 UTC
Editorial Bob Cringeley makes a bold statement in a blog post responding to Apple's iCloud announcement: "Jobs is going to sacrifice the Macintosh in order to kill Windows." He says, "The incumbent platform today is Windows because it is in Windows machines that nearly all of our data and our ability to use that data have been trapped. But the Apple announcement changes all that. Suddenly the competition isn't about platforms at all, but about data, with that data being crunched on a variety of platforms through the use of cheap downloaded apps."
Thread beginning with comment 476345
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
pabloski
Member since:
2009-09-28

Interoperability. They want to place the data in the cloud, hoping users will demand interoperability ( i.e. they want to read the data produced on their windows PC on the iphone ) and force microsoft to stop being an evil tyrant.

Reply Parent Score: -1

Pro-Competition Member since:
2007-08-20

Interoperability. They want to place the data in the cloud, hoping users will demand interoperability ( i.e. they want to read the data produced on their windows PC on the iphone ) and force microsoft to stop being an evil tyrant.


"Interoperability" in my book would allow access across competing platforms (hence my name on this site).

The iCloud sounds to me like replacing one evil tyrant with another (probably worse).

Reply Parent Score: 11

No it isnt Member since:
2005-11-14

And that will kill Windows just how? By ensuring Windows has to be interoperable so that iGizmo users can continue using Windows. Sorry, can't see how that will work.

I can see, however, Apple doing the other thing: making cool cloud services that work with the iThings and not with the competition. Say, for instance, their music service only working with iTunes and iPod/iPhone. But cool as it is (and "evil" in the best tradition from One Microsoft Way), it won't kill anything.

Reply Parent Score: 3

lieutenantmudd Member since:
2011-06-07

I have paid for MobileMe for two years because I don't like Google calendar's aesthetics and I like bookmark syncing to my iPhone.

I can tell you, most of iCloud is not a game changer. And Windows won't even blink at any of the services except one - iTunes in the Cloud.

I know a ton of people who use Windows PC (and Macs often) for two purposes:
1. A web browser
2. iTunes

Most people have iPods and those people need a PC or Mac to use it. With iTunes in the Cloud (now with iPod Touches, maybe one day with other iPods), those users are free to buy things like Chromebooks or rely on iPads alone.

I don't buy the argument for "data" in general. I buy the argument for iTunes and music.

Reply Parent Score: 1

Lennie Member since:
2007-09-22

It might not kill Windows, but it would (help) make Windows less important.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

The only problem is that Apple want to be the new evil tyrant.

Reply Parent Score: 4

_xmv Member since:
2008-12-09

Interoperability. They want to place the data in the cloud, hoping users will demand interoperability ( i.e. they want to read the data produced on their windows PC on the iphone ) and force microsoft to stop being an evil tyrant.

you made me laugh.

Reply Parent Score: 3