Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Jun 2011 18:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 476738
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-12-25
I like that analogy, but still... I think you are focusing on one dot and not seeing a bigger picture. Government doesn't just come up with one isolated event after another. This is not one sole moment that is going to do everything that is said it will do. Even if everything happening is just one random, isolated coincidence right after another, each and every little thing adds up to one big thing. In a free world, the government doesn't have control. The law serves the people. So what role does any government in the free world have in "policing" and "civilising" the internet? I don't even know what that means! There are already laws that people can be arrested for that, even on the internet. This amounts to nothing more than control. Who's controling everything, though? There's no government scheming amongst itself to control "the people". There is a much smaller group who has control over even the governments. Conspiracy theorize much?