Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Jun 2011 18:51 UTC
Internet & Networking It's official now. The signs had been there for a while now. While the west bangs on about the importance of freedom and democracy, they don't actually want anyone to have too much of it. The US, France, and the UK have jointly pretty much declared war on freedom on the web.
Thread beginning with comment 476795
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Goofy duffas.
by pantheraleo on Fri 10th Jun 2011 15:13 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Goofy duffas."
pantheraleo
Member since:
2007-03-07

Right, because if you don't agree with incredible draconian arguments parroted about in the name of "protecting the children" you're a pederast. Right.


Interesting that you didn't actually address the question. I asked you if you were arguing that child pornography is OK, and you skirted around the question without actually answering it. It was a Yes or No question. You didn't give a clear answer.

Can I assume your unwillingness to answer the question directly means that you do think child porn is OK? And that's why you are unwilling to give a simple yes or no answer?

Edited 2011-06-10 15:14 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: Goofy duffas.
by jabjoe on Fri 10th Jun 2011 16:10 in reply to "RE[4]: Goofy duffas."
jabjoe Member since:
2009-05-06

Shouldn't feed the trolls, but I'm bored. As well you must know, the question isn't if he's ok with child pornography, which I very much doubt, because next to no one is. The question is what fighting child pornography justifies. Your stance appears to be "everything, and if you disagree with me, you must be for child pornography". Which is pretty much a straw man argument.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Goofy duffas.
by Soulbender on Fri 10th Jun 2011 16:17 in reply to "RE[4]: Goofy duffas."
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

Can I assume your unwillingness to answer the question directly means that you do think child porn is OK


No I do not. Can I assume your failure to comprehend what I wrote and your pointless trolling as you being a dumbass?

Edited 2011-06-10 16:18 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[6]: Goofy duffas.
by pantheraleo on Fri 10th Jun 2011 17:03 in reply to "RE[5]: Goofy duffas."
pantheraleo Member since:
2007-03-07

No I do not. Can I assume your failure to comprehend what I wrote and your pointless trolling as you being a dumbass?


Ah. So now you are resorting to name calling. I'm sorry to see you aren't capable of coming up with a better response than a personal insult. But at least you finally answered the question.

Edited 2011-06-10 17:05 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2