Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Jun 2011 18:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 476805
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Chile not part of the west?
by Wolf@Larsen on Fri 10th Jun 2011 23:46
in reply to "RE[2]: Chile not part of the west? "
And I suppose the best definition of the West would be: cultural area sharing both Christian moral values and Roman legal rules.
Chile is encluded, no doubt! (by the way, there was more freedom in Chile than in some European conutries in the past; some politician refugees like Domeyko found there their second homeplace).
Someone mentioned "Spain and Portugal are not considred to be part of the West".
?????!!!!
I always thought them to bethe Westernmost Europeans, except of Irish, maybe.... hehe. Seriously, are not we proud of Columbus or da Ghama, as Europeans?
RE[4]: Chile not part of the west?
by M.Onty on Sat 11th Jun 2011 15:22
in reply to "RE[3]: Chile not part of the west? "




Member since:
2009-10-23
I know where you're coming from, because that tends to be how I view 'The West', but I'm not sure about it now you've put it into a list. That is basically the anglophere plus Europe. You've listed former white British colonies, but excluded former white Portugese, Spanish and Dutch colonies---all places where the original cultures were stamped all over and replaced with European ones almost as much as in the British ones.
I suppose the best definition of East/West would be places with a population of primarily European descent/primarily Asian descent. It used to be neat---Roughly west/East of Constantinople, but everyone went and moved about.
This is getting pedantic, but its interesting, I reckon.