To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
And Apple allows none. So yeah... Apple is till the odd one out.
I've read this here a few times in various articles, and someone, can't remember who, posted this link
http://developer.apple.com/programs/ios/distribute.html
that has a section about Ad Hoc Distribution,
So I'm a bit confused. Can someone clarify for me how Apple is the odd one out when it seems their option is less restrictive than Symbian? Is there something I'm misinterpreting?
By default, Symbian blocks applications without a certificate. However, you can disable this block - you'll get a warning you can dismiss. This way, you can distribute an application any way you like. The OP failed to mention this.
just to clarify: this is a switch in the UI - not a hack. It's implemented by Symbian developers. Go to Tools > App mgr > Options > Settings.
Edited 2011-06-19 21:29 UTC
Yes and no. The problem with Open Signed Online is that you can't easily redistribute your software, as every new user will have to contact Nokia and repeat the signing process again.
As "superior" signing methods require you to sign on the behalf of a company, I guess that homebrew must stick with self-signed, which has several limitations (you are limited with basic user-mode applications rights, no advanced system capabilities) and displays a warning each time the application is installed.
Thankfully, I was wrong about self-signed applications : they'll work on any device, provided that the user has disabled certificate checks and that he accepts the warning. They just have limited capabilities.
Edited 2011-06-20 05:49 UTC





Member since:
2009-05-19
I'm 99.9% sure that homebrew falls under the ***Open Signed Online***
And Apple allows none. So yeah... Apple is till the odd one out.