Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 16th Jun 2011 22:55 UTC, submitted by lucas_maximus
Thread beginning with comment 477877
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: No one changes before someone else changes
by pantheraleo on Mon 20th Jun 2011 21:43
in reply to "RE[2]: No one changes before someone else changes"
Assuming for the sake of argument that say a Flash solution is the best technically for a given client you advocate not using it because some future hypothetical client might object. I don't agree with this philosophy.
If you are building software specifically for a given client, and that client is paying you to develop the software for them, that's a different story. The client owns the rights to the software you develop then. In that case, if the client allows flash, and it's a good fit. Then go ahead and use it.
I'm talking something where you develop a more generalized solution to a business problem that you might want to try to sell to 50, 100, or more customers. Think of it this way, if Google Apps, and GMail were written in Flash instead of Javascript, that would be a deal breaker for some potential business customers that don't allow Flash.
I'm talking software more along those types of lines. You may not have any customers when you develop the software. You plan to sell it to them as a service after you have developed it. In that case, it's foolish to use flash / flex. Because not all businesses allow flash. So some future customers might reject your software because it requires flash.
Edited 2011-06-20 21:47 UTC




Member since:
2007-03-15
Assuming for the sake of argument that say a Flash solution is the best technically for a given client you advocate not using it because some future hypothetical client might object. I don't agree with this philosophy.