Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 22nd Jun 2011 14:42 UTC
./fistbump.sh. We're honoured to follow in your footsteps!
Thread beginning with comment 478284
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: The stories that will not be broadcasted
by Soulbender on Wed 22nd Jun 2011 23:02
in reply to "RE[2]: The stories that will not be broadcasted"
I just saw a government outlawing businesses.
The government outlaws a lot of stuff that you could potentially make money from. Sometimes that's good, sometimes not so.
Dozens of people will come home from work today and tell their families they don't have a job anymore.
Don't be so dramatic unless you can back it up.
No you really have such a naive faith in governments as it seems?
No but neither do I have the almost endearing, misguided faith in the inherent good of the market that many people seem to have.
RE[3]: The stories that will not be broadcasted
by Alfman on Wed 22nd Jun 2011 23:13
in reply to "RE[2]: The stories that will not be broadcasted"
Berend de Boer,
"I just saw a government outlawing businesses. Dozens of people will come home from work today and tell their families they don't have a job anymore."
Well, if the companies' business models are oppressive or discriminatory, then I have no problem telling them to either close up shop or find a business model which actually serves customers instead of controlling us.
I don't want my ISP dictating what services I use. Whole swaths of the WWW could be relegated to premium subscriptions because those site owners don't have contracts in place with the ISPs. This is pretty much what it will come to if we allow ISPs to discriminate traffic.
RE[4]: The stories that will not be broadcasted
by Lennie on Wed 22nd Jun 2011 23:36
in reply to "RE[3]: The stories that will not be broadcasted"
RE[4]: The stories that will not be broadcasted
by Berend de Boer on Thu 23rd Jun 2011 02:06
in reply to "RE[3]: The stories that will not be broadcasted"
Well, if the companies' business models are oppressive or discriminatory, then I have no problem telling them to either close up shop or find a business model which actually serves customers instead of controlling us.
These are companies providing filtering services for their customers (i.e. porn filters), so customers get so called "safe" internet.
That just became illegal.





Member since:
2005-10-19
I just saw a government outlawing businesses.
Dozens of people will come home from work today and tell their families they don't have a job anymore.
Do you really have such a naive faith in governments as it seems?