Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 19th Jun 2011 18:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 478407
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-06
No, it's completely different. You're talking about a very small set of driver DDIs for a limited set of devices; whereas, opening the engineering specs exposes the device to a potentially unlimited set of partners. That will increase your costs.
No. You buy an expensive car, you don't get schematics for the components in that car, either. You don't get schematics for your DVR or your Blu-Ray player or virtually other kind of consumer device.
The reason that hacking isn't more common is that manufacturers will void your warranty if you're running a jailbreak device. And I don't blame them. Who would want to support a broken device that's the result of hacking?