Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Sat 25th Jun 2011 08:55 UTC, submitted by John
Thread beginning with comment 478659
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Read the post again. He was talking about having an official sideloading mechanism, like what Microsoft apparently plans to do with WP7.
Could be the winning compromise in the end, and though I'm not fond of it it could be satisfactory.
Could be the winning compromise in the end, and though I'm not fond of it it could be satisfactory.
My guess is that Apple will make it as easy and attractive as possible for its users to download apps from its curated App Store. And, it will still be just as easy to choose to install apps from web downloads etc; but perhaps Apple will insert enhanced cautions or warnings about installs that don't source from their store.
Yes, that would be a great solution, but then everyone on here and every pundit on the internet will complain and moan and rant and rave that it is a "closed system" or "walled garden" and therefore is worthless because you can't install open source software on it, or Apple is being its usual draconian control-freak self, or some other such nonsense.
You are 100% right on that! People keep forgetting that Apple's main goal is to support mom and pop, not power users!





Member since:
2006-06-01
Yes, that would be a great solution, but then everyone on here and every pundit on the internet will complain and moan and rant and rave that it is a "closed system" or "walled garden" and therefore is worthless because you can't install open source software on it, or Apple is being its usual draconian control-freak self, or some other such nonsense.