Linked by Elv13 on Mon 27th Jun 2011 14:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 478826
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: object oriented techniques in kernels
by AndrewZ on Mon 27th Jun 2011 21:41
in reply to "RE: object oriented techniques in kernels"
RE[3]: object oriented techniques in kernels
by galvanash on Mon 27th Jun 2011 22:05
in reply to "RE[2]: object oriented techniques in kernels"
The techniques talked about in the article are ancient... The vast majority of them have been in the kernel since, well pretty much forever (Linus started doing a lot of this psuedo-OO stuff himself when it was mostly just him).
I'm just saying I fail to see how this promotes "newness" in Linux when they are describing things that have, for the most part, always been there.




Member since:
2006-01-25
I didn't get that at all from the linked articles. They were both studies on what OO techniques are currently used in the Linux kernel and how they are implemented. There is no "promotion" at all - it is simply a technical analysis of what is already there. There are a couple of minor (and valid) criticisms of the specific techniques used, but overall it is just a good technical analysis.
Where do you see anyone "promoting" anything?