Linked by _txf_ on Tue 28th Jun 2011 06:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 478861
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Corporate foot-dragging
by pantheraleo on Tue 28th Jun 2011 13:07
in reply to "RE[4]: Corporate foot-dragging"
Like what? Really, if the extensions don't follow firefox update speed, you should not blame Firefox. Maybe you made some poor extension choices?
No.... We should blame Firefox. For not giving us any time at all to test whether their new browser is compatible with the Web apps / plugins we use before forcing it on us. This really is going to hurt Firefox adoption in the enterprise. It was a really dumb move on Mozilla's part.
RE[6]: Corporate foot-dragging
by jgagnon on Tue 28th Jun 2011 13:52
in reply to "RE[5]: Corporate foot-dragging"
RE[5]: Corporate foot-dragging
by Alfman on Tue 28th Jun 2011 16:56
in reply to "RE[4]: Corporate foot-dragging"
eldarion,
"Like what? Really, if the extensions don't follow firefox update speed, you should not blame Firefox. Maybe you made some poor extension choices?"
Wow, I can't believe what I'm hearing.
I've personally seen FF updates break extensions, it's very frustrating. According to you we should blame the extension author, but not every 3rd party developer has the resources to keep up with mozilla's betas, I know I wouldn't. Doesn't mozilla deserve more of them blame since it was they who caused things to break?
Edited 2011-06-28 17:04 UTC




Member since:
2008-12-15
Actually, unlike Firefox, Chrome supports both .MSIs and GPO so I'd say this latest move by Moz was just dumb.
Is this what you are looking for?
http://www.frontmotion.com/Firefox/
Firefox killed about a third of my extensions with their little stunt, including some that my customers counted on for security.
Like what? Really, if the extensions don't follow firefox update speed, you should not blame Firefox. Maybe you made some poor extension choices?