Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 28th Jun 2011 22:16 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 479096
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-06-22
I read few posts about the potential of becoming an accessory to crime by disclosing flaws that Apple was made aware of earlier. What a joke! If not de jure, someone is even reverting to ethical standards. Are you fri... kiding me? Are you that blind??
How about this: Apple is moraly responsible and bound by law, to do due dilligence and protect my personal information! If they fail to take proactive measures despite recieving all relevant infrormation and in the proces my information is used to harm me, I would take them (Apple) to court! This is akin to "inside job" ... bank management knew of faulty lock and failed to replace it? What does that mean, they were part of the heist or what?