Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 19th Oct 2005 11:36 UTC
Internet & Networking A new resolution introduced in the US Senate offers political backing to the Bush administration by slamming a United Nations effort to exert more influence over the Internet. At the heart of this international political spat is the unique influence that the US federal government enjoys over Internet addresses and the master database of top-level domain names - a legacy of the Internet's origins years ago. The Bush administration recently raised objections to the proposed addition of .xxx as a red-light district for pornographers, for instance, a veto power that no other government is able to wield.
Thread beginning with comment 47925
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Geez...
by on Wed 19th Oct 2005 17:09 UTC in reply to "Geez..."

Member since:

tell me would this new body have the type of 1st ammendment protections in place like the US has? people here keep saying international body of democratic nations, but fail to realize that many democratic nations are not free. For example, go to paris france and wear a shirt with a swatstik (regardless of context) and see what happens (you go to jail accused of being a Nazi). Now do the same thing in DC and watch everyone ignore or laugh at you.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 0

RE[2]: Geez...
by on Wed 19th Oct 2005 17:18 in reply to "RE: Geez..."
Member since:

True but I wasn't really thinking about that. I think the US should retain control of the existing .com .net .org .mil and .gov and let the rest of the world play with the rest. To much american money and time has gone into those to let them be shut down or stolen because of some silly dispute else where in the world. Yahoo and Ebay would probally lose there domains since they don't bow to certain places demands.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 0

RE[2]: Geez...
by on Wed 19th Oct 2005 21:38 in reply to "RE: Geez..."
Member since:

"tell me would this new body have the type of 1st ammendment protections in place like the US has? people here keep saying international body of democratic nations, but fail to realize that many democratic nations are not free. For example, go to paris france and wear a shirt with a swatstik (regardless of context) and see what happens (you go to jail accused of being a Nazi). Now do the same thing in DC and watch everyone ignore or laugh at you"

Walk around in DC wearing a "Bush is a terrorist" -shirt, get abducted by FBI-agents enforcing Patriot Act, disappear and no-one will ever hear from you again. So much for your freedom and democracy.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 0

RE[3]: Geez...
by ACarlow on Wed 19th Oct 2005 23:00 in reply to "RE[2]: Geez..."
ACarlow Member since:
2005-10-18

"Walk around in DC wearing a "Bush is a terrorist" -shirt, get abducted by FBI-agents enforcing Patriot Act, disappear and no-one will ever hear from you again. So much for your freedom and democracy"

I hate to break it to you but wearing that tshirt is totally legal.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1