To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Didn't you hear the man? They're keeping a low profile because everyone wants to steal the code for their open source product. Uhm..no wait...wtf.
It's not, as long as you use it right. It certainly has some flaws but as long as you're aware of them and use the tool as intended it can be useful. Used wrong anything can be made to be "bad security".
Scare mongering = sales.
Hi Soulbender, it is me, Alex.
So let me give you some answers.n.runs AG is one of the best pentesting companies here in Germany and tested it. Call them, one of the two directors is American. http://www.nruns.com/_en/impressum.php. It is DOnald Lee.
You forgot the 4 Laptops in addition to the 2 LBs.
It first has been published in IDG Computerwoche in the online blog "Security Expert Council - called Security Expertenrat", but IDG closed that blog in 2010. Look it up in Google Cache please.
We are not afraid that somebody steels the code for the Unix OS, but for the control panel software (licenseware) which controls the security functions we have implemented. We have no intention of making people scary, we are just selling a secure OS.
Why do you argue so agressive? Be happy. Somebody invented something for good. By the way, Chief Developer was Marc Delling. Laugh, we are going to make our money with it anyhow, we already do. But just in case, that somebody spends 10 mandays in front of an SE-Linux to get it secure, we have a quicker, and well, of course a more expensive solution.
We send David a copy of the license soon, so maybe you got a chance to look at it too.
Bye for now, Alex
Yes, unfortunately it does create some sales, but it also scares away more informed customers. The article has me curious, but highly suspicious and dubious due to scaremongering tone. There have been a lot of snake oil security companies. Without wider distribution and use, it won't get the linux security community excited. If they get excited, then I'm excited and might consider it.






Member since:
2006-05-23
This is interesting, but it also feels like Tsolkas is pushing his product. Not that he doesn't have a right to do that; but the whole thing looks just a little odd to me. And HSS doesn't seem to have much of a following; Googling it turns up this article and little else.
Also, I don't know Systrace from Adam, but considering the OpenBSD people consider it okay, I'm a bit confused by Tsolkas' dismissal of it as providing "bad security."
I'll admit I'm no security guru. But doesn't this smack a bit of scare marketing and FUD?
Edit: "Director Sales & Marketing..." Oh yeah. Duh.
Edited 2011-06-30 16:14 UTC