To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
In addition to the white paper, you should also provide the source code to the modified linux kernel. Code matters more than white papers. In your zeal to sell your products you overreach with your claims ( just looking at the claims for RHiPP: Hint, its not the only file transfer protocol to ensure that the file is copied correctly). You might have a great product, but there is nothing any one can really look at to verify those high claims.
It would also be a sign of good faith to divulge your plans for the linux kernel. Are you going to try and intigrate it into the official kernel? Are you going to try and keep your patches up to date? The whitepaper refers to kernel 6.17 which is old as dirt (2006). Even RHEL 5 used a newer kernel (2.6.18) upon release.




Member since:
2006-07-14
Well, It was a sales pitch with minimal technical info. If they wanted to discuss the technology behind it, thats great they should have tried that instead of the sales pitch.
But for what its worth Google translate does a fair job on their whitepaper. it doesn't make me feel any more comfortable about the product, but you might find some good discussion points
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http~*~...