Linked by Kaj de Vos on Tue 5th Jul 2011 17:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 479619
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Nice to see a non-C compiler
by pandronic on Tue 5th Jul 2011 20:38
in reply to "RE: Nice to see a non-C compiler"
RE[3]: Nice to see a non-C compiler
by burnttoys on Wed 6th Jul 2011 13:04
in reply to "RE[2]: Nice to see a non-C compiler"
Maybe try Javascript with the V8 engine? Maybe PERL to C. If you don't like C syntax then maybe C# is out of the question, shame. It's a very good language... hmmm... actually most of it is fairly ordinary but Lambda expressions combined with LINQ are beautiful.
PHP can be compiled (I think it's PHP->C++->Compiler->code).
There are options!
The glib answer is "write your own C++ library" in which all objects are _really_ objects and inheritance is a dynamic runtime property... at which point I'd give up and use Javascript!





Member since:
2010-01-21
I'm hoping that this "make a restricted subset for the run time, compiled extensions, and/or systems programming" pattern will catch on.
Of course, I'm a Python programmer. That opinion is no big surprise, given that we came up with Pyrex/Cython and PyPy's RPython.
...makes me wonder how close RPython might come to Haskell's elegant implementation of "statically but implicitly typed" if they eventually decide to make RPython into something that's useful as a full-blown systems programming language rather than just a way to write your code so the slow parts can be compiled to native if necessary.