Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 5th Jul 2011 22:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 479641
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Patents are patents
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 5th Jul 2011 22:56
in reply to "RE[3]: Patents are patents"
RE[5]: Patents are patents
by gedmurphy on Tue 5th Jul 2011 23:02
in reply to "RE[4]: Patents are patents"
RE[5]: Patents are patents
by Not2Sure on Wed 6th Jul 2011 06:30
in reply to "RE[4]: Patents are patents"
RE[4]: Patents are patents
by bnolsen on Wed 6th Jul 2011 00:24
in reply to "RE[3]: Patents are patents"
RE[4]: Patents are patents
by Flatland_Spider on Wed 6th Jul 2011 00:31
in reply to "RE[3]: Patents are patents"




.

Member since:
2005-12-23
Yes, this is my point. Microsoft are just doing what any other company would do. Anyone who disagrees would never cut it in business.
It's a little unfair to criminalize MS as Thom's post does. And invoking a criminal organization like anonymous to attack them is rather unfortunate.
Edited 2011-07-05 22:55 UTC