Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 5th Jul 2011 22:12 UTC
Microsoft "One of Microsoft's hottest new profit centers is a smartphone platform you've definitely heard of: Android. Google's Linux-based mobile operating system is a favorite target for Microsoft's patent attorneys, who are suing numerous Android vendors and just today announced that another manufacturer has agreed to write checks to Microsoft every time it ships an Android device. Microsoft's latest target is Wistron Corp., which has signed a patent agreement 'that provides broad coverage under Microsoft's patent portfolio for Wistron's tablets, mobile phones, e-readers and other consumer devices running the Android or Chrome platform', Microsoft announced." That's the reality we live in, folks. This is at least as criminal - if not more so - than Microsoft's monopoly abuse late last century. After the Nortel crap, it's completely left the black helicopter camp for me: Microsoft, Apple, and several others are working together to fight Android the only way they know how: with underhand mafia tactics. Absolutely sickening. Hey Anonymous, are you listening? YES I WENT THERE.
Thread beginning with comment 479665
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

Yes because Brazil, or any country without strict IP laws is just making such huge advances in new technology. It takes money to make money. Patents are there in order to help protect the years of R&D it takes to take the human race forward technologically.

One can make more profit in either of two ways: (1) increase sales and/or prices, or (2) reduce costs.

If a consortium of producers whose primary business is NOT writing software get together and collaborate to produce software they can all use, they can significantly reduce costs.

Provision of software is not a profit centre to the vast, vast majority of people and businesses, it is a cost. It is a cost that is a prime candidate for cost reduction.

Software patents potentially stand in the way of achieving this cost reduction. Software patents engender nothing but a significant and totally un-necessary cost burden for the vast, vast majority of people and businesses. They are therefore a huge burden, and an un-necessary impost on society.

You can read about the economics of this topic here if you are interested:

BTW, Brazil is making quite a lot of headway in the area of reducing its economic costs of software through the use of FOSS software.

Edited 2011-07-06 00:01 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4

Thom_Holwerda Member since:

Much worse, they hamper innovation. A software patent blocks others from making totally different solutions - codewise - that could be vastly more efficient. These illegal solutions could lead to faster, safer, better, cheaper products.

Reply Parent Score: 5