Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 5th Jul 2011 22:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 479773
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Patents are patents
by pantheraleo on Wed 6th Jul 2011 14:20
in reply to "RE[7]: Patents are patents"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patent
How about you have fun reading. Specifically, the section on the history of software patents. Even the article you linked to doesn't support your claim. The year 1998 isn't even mentioned in the article except as a publication date for one of the references. So what part of your ass did you pull that date out of? But that's what I've come to expect from you. You twist, distort, rewrite, revise, and take history out of context to make it support your own views.
You never did answer the question either about whether you have ever written any commercial software. Or whether you have ever even written any software at all.
Edited 2011-07-06 14:25 UTC
RE[9]: Patents are patents
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 6th Jul 2011 14:24
in reply to "RE[8]: Patents are patents"
Your retort to Wikipedia's detailed recollection of the history of software patents is to post a summary of that article which basically states the same thing?
Whut?
You never did answer the question either about whether you have ever written any commercial software. Or whether you have ever even written any software at all.
Because it is a strawman. Just because I may or may not have developed software in no way invalidates my arguments - arguments, I might add, which are getting far more support in here than yours.





Member since:
2005-06-29
The United States has granted software patents since at least 1972.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patents_under_United_States_p...
Have fun reading.