Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Jul 2011 14:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 479869
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-17
When Android was in google labs, noone cared. Yet now every company owning a patent remotely doing something related to Linux, Java, touch screen, wants a toll. I bet HTC got very good terms, therefore they accepted - hint: they do make WP7 phones. Samsung is a big fish however. They will countersue and we'll see a settlement without disclosing any terms. And max $5 per phone IMHO.
Also this seems to look as a kind of coordinated effort of Apple and MS. Too big to fail, they have power to affect (lobby) their legal system to serve them a purpose in extortionism.
One "unfortunate" thing: this only covers phones sold in USA due to US patents, and sw patents are mostly absent form other major economies with few exceptions. This is not some high luxury market where most of money comes from US - people use phones anywhere around the world, and that includes smartphones. Most are going to shell out enough cash to get one.
Do we even know what kind of patents MS has on Android?