Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 12th Jul 2011 20:47 UTC
Legal Tell 'm like it is, HTC. "HTC is disappointed at Apple's constant attempts at litigations instead of competing fairly in the market," said HTC general counsel Grace Lei in a statement, "HTC strongly denies all infringement claims raised by Apple in the past and present and reiterates our determination and commitment to protect our intellectual property rights."
Thread beginning with comment 480559
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

Go ahead. The internet will recognise your scam pretty quickly. Not only will you always be behind with your "news", people will see you for the scammer that you are and ignore your site anyway. Remember, most people read OSNews not because of my nonsense, but because of the comments - which you won't have because people know you're a scammer.

I know you think you are clever and have me backed into a corner, but sorry kiddo, you haven't. People have actually regularly tried to do what you are proposing, and what a surprise, they don't ever succeed.

Oh, and before I go - I guess this means you are okay with HTC, Samsung, LG, Motorola, Sony Ericsson and Google suing the crap out of Apple since Apple copied the Android notification system verbatim, right? I guess you are also okay with the countless pre-iOS mobile application stores suing the crap out of Apple right? And is Palm free to sue the crap out of Apple for stealing countless things from PalmOS (as a heavy PalmOS user, iOS almost feels like a 1:1 copy).

You want me to go on, or do you want me to save you the embarrassment?

Edited 2011-07-12 22:09 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 8

Jennimc Member since:

Just to make sure I understand you Thom... it's a scam when someone copies from osnews... but not a scam when people copy Apple?

For the record copying an idea to get things done is not the same as copying the product itself. Notifications is a idea to get things done. The execution on how its done if copied can be litigated if its a genuine copy.

If Apple copied Google's notification then yes Apple should be sued.... though not by HTC, Samsung, LG, Motorola or Sony Ericsson (what case do you believe any of these companies have against Apple?) but by Google. I'm not familiar enough with Google's implementation nor Apple's to say if copying did occur and because Apple's implementation isn't yet released... neither do you.

The application store is similar in that its an idea to get things done. Apple didn't copy any other mobile application store so I'm going to assume that you're confused about what's able to be protected under patent and what's not.

The other items you elude to that Apple supposedly copied from Palm require more explanation before a response can be given. But yes, if Apple copied the implementation then absolutely, Apple should be sued. That nobody has sued Apple thus far over these apparent issues says that they in fact did not copy them rather than Palm having a generous philosophy as it sounds like you believe.

I stuck up for you... I said you weren't a hypocrite. I'd hate to be wrong about that.

Edited 2011-07-12 22:25 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

Thom_Holwerda Member since:

Except... Nobody copied Apple. Show me the code that has been copied. If no code has been copied, then your accusation falls flat. They may have violated software patents, but nobody in the sane tech world (i.e., outside of the US) gives a shit about those, since we chuckle at the idea of patenting math.

You clearly don't know how software development works these days. It is virtually impossible to write any piece of code without violating a sofware patent in the US. You seem to think this is healthy and good for competition - luckily for us, only people with pro-MS/Apple agenda seem to think so.

Reply Parent Score: 2

jack_perry Member since:

And is Palm free to sue the crap out of Apple for stealing countless things from PalmOS (as a heavy PalmOS user, iOS almost feels like a 1:1 copy).

I have no intention of getting into your bigger fight, but I use both PalmOS & iOS regularly, and I don't think they're very similar at all.

Speaking of PalmOS and patents, though: I'm curious whether anyone knows that the successful Xerox lawsuit against Graffiti was based on a software patent or a hardware patent? Or is that a difficult gray area?

Reply Parent Score: 2

kristoph Member since:

You see your already getting defensive by even the prospect of a copy of OSNews and here you are spouting off about how it's awful that other companies are defensive about the copies of their ideas/inventions. Like you these companies are defensive and their reacting to it.

You might argue something is obvious but I might disagree. This is what this is about really, two groups of individuals disagreeing about what is unique and what is obvious. (Just with proverbial nuclear weapons.)


PS. You should know that copying OSNews by automatically polling your servers and scraping your content would not actually be that hard and some basic grayhat SEO would likely make that content more authoritative then your original content (in effect making your original content look like the scamming copy) thereby depriving you of organic traffic.

What keeps people from doing that (other than a profit motive and a general respect for OSnews and you as an editor) is the awareness that you have copyright law on your side and you could make life difficult for the copier through legal avenues.

Or are you really saying that you would never use a lawyer (and hence copyright laws) to defend your intellectual rights.

Reply Parent Score: 2

danger_nakamura Member since:

Actually, his exact words were "Go ahead." He then goes on to state basically that it wouldn't work out well for you, not that he would stop it.

It's OK to disagree with someone, but can we at least agree to disagree with what they actually said? Is that asking too much of an internet forum?

Reply Parent Score: 1