HTC Disappointed Apple Chooses Litigation over Fair Competition
Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 12th Jul 2011 20:47 UTC
Legal Tell 'm like it is, HTC. "HTC is disappointed at Apple's constant attempts at litigations instead of competing fairly in the market," said HTC general counsel Grace Lei in a statement, "HTC strongly denies all infringement claims raised by Apple in the past and present and reiterates our determination and commitment to protect our intellectual property rights."
E-mail Print r 4   73 Comment(s) http://osne.ws/j8t
Thread beginning with comment 480592
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Misleading argument from HTC
by JAlexoid on Tue 12th Jul 2011 23:35 UTC in reply to "Misleading argument from HTC"
JAlexoid
Member since:
2009-05-19

Personally, I think there is justification for it, as HTC among others created a product very similar to Apple's.


I'd say since HTC was in the PDA arena for longer, it's Apple that created a product very similar to HTC's.

Apple's complaint basically targets Android, so no wonder... I can see why they started fighting Samsung, but HTC!?!?!?

Reply Parent Score: 4

Jennimc Member since:
2011-06-22

[q]Personally, I think there is justification for it, as HTC among others created a product very similar to Apple's.


[q]I'd say since HTC was in the PDA arena for longer, it's Apple that created a product very similar to HTC's./q]


That doesn't make sense. Just because Apple enters a market doesn't mean they are copying.

Reply Parent Score: 1

danger_nakamura Member since:
2011-06-21

So when Apple moves inot an area to compete it is "entering a market." When others then move to compete with Apple, it is stealing.

Thank you for clearing that up.

Reply Parent Score: 4

Beta Member since:
2005-07-06

That doesn't make sense. Just because Apple enters a market doesn't mean they are copying.


They copied the idea of a phone.
They borrowed the notion of an aerial for communication.

Now do you notice how silly your argument looks?

Reply Parent Score: 3