Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Jul 2011 07:29 UTC, submitted by Gregory
Thread beginning with comment 480700
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Have you recently downloaded a copy? Because it's not note worthy any more it seems.
I did download it some time ago, and it wasn't bad. When I say "noteworthy" about a Hurd based distro, what I mean is that it boots and is somewhat useable for doing simple stuff without crashing.
9months is not that out of day... the whole point of arch is you install the base and then upgrade from the repositories.
The Archlinux install cds weren't built but every few months in the past and only recently from what I remember do they provide "nightlies" I have upgraded arch installs that were over a year old and upgraded fine.
9months is not that out of day... the whole point of arch is you install the base and then upgrade from the repositories.
The Archlinux install cds weren't built but every few months in the past and only recently from what I remember do they provide "nightlies" I have upgraded arch installs that were over a year old and upgraded fine.
The Archlinux install cds weren't built but every few months in the past and only recently from what I remember do they provide "nightlies" I have upgraded arch installs that were over a year old and upgraded fine.
I've been an Arch user for many years now so I know the whole point of Arch thank you very much.
My point was that as the latest build is already out of date and even that is impossible to get hold of; ArchHurd is clearly missing some TLC lately and thus I would struggle to consider it "note worthy" until some ISOs become available again.
That is unless anyone else can find a working mirror? Because I sure couldn't
Edited 2011-07-13 19:45 UTC
It's GNU HURD, what difference would 9 months make?
For the last time, my point was ***I COULD NOT DOWNLOAD THAT ISO***!!
9 months in itself wouldn't have bothered me because a simple 'pacman -Suy' would have fixed any problems there (I regularly use "out of date" Arch install CDs for the same reason).
However if you can't even download the aforementioned ISO then you're dead before you've even started!
Sorry if I sound ratty, but I've said this 3 times now and people are still missing the point.
Edited 2011-07-14 07:03 UTC





Member since:
2007-03-26
PS. http://www.archhurd.org/ is also a noteworthy Hurd distro.
Have you recently downloaded a copy? Because it's not note worthy any more it seems.
I (coincidently) tried to download ArchHurd before reading your post and eventually gave up.
The newest ISO is 9 months out of date (which is a long time in Arch-land) and even that is nearly impossible to get hold of:
* the .torrent file doesn't exist any more
* and the HTTP mirrors ETA at a 2 day download (bare in mind Debians DVD ISO is ~10x larger yet took < 1.5hrs to download on my connection)
Pity really as in an ideal world I'd have preferred Arch over Debian.
Edited 2011-07-13 10:05 UTC