Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Jul 2011 07:29 UTC, submitted by Gregory
Thread beginning with comment 480879
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-04-07
Well, it will be also much more. GNUstep can do already more than OpenStep did, as far as the framework is concerned. Application wise of course there is only what open-source provides, we have a host of applications that need some care.
Actually, it is already possible to run GNUstep on Hurd quite well. Most applications work to 90% already, I made them run. Stability is not perfect and some features are missing because the implementation on HURD may be not trivial (like detection of mounted volumes in the Workspace).
But it is already much better than one may think.
Of course other things like Sound or battery information depend on the drivers of HURD...
I hope Mach's capability of running on multiple cpus will be revamped in GNU-mac, in today's hyper-threading and multi-core CPUs it would shine, much more than XNU's "monolithic atop of micro" approac.