To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
How can you even compare software on two different sets of hardware? Your PC is probably a non-brand one, is at least two times cheaper than your Mac, and has a pair of crappy Realtek NICs with a driver disk from 2004 and no driver updates released via Windows Update. Are any OS updates installed at all? Oh, wait... Are we talking Vista here? ))
p.s. Care to provide network traces? ICMP pings are too trivial for network stack efficiency to manifest itself. Normally it is compared by bulk TCP transfers, number of packets/connections processed in a fixed amount of CPU time, etc.
Edited 2011-07-15 22:20 UTC
static666,
"How can you even compare software on two different sets of hardware? Your PC is probably a non-brand one, is at least two times cheaper than your Mac, and "
A "good decrease in ping rates" is extremely vague to me also. Ping is hardly a sufficient benchmark for comparing network stacks. From my 3GHz core2 under linux (a couple years old), I get <1ms pings to my router. It hardly says anything about how well it performs under real world loads.
If I had a mac pc, I'd compile the same benchmark under macos and linux, and then dual boot to compare the difference. But since I don't, I have to take other people at their word.
Edited 2011-07-16 02:08 UTC




Member since:
2010-09-18
i just went from pc to mac. and i have noticed a good decrease in ping rates. even on wireless. mac's network stack must be more efficient.