Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 22nd Jul 2011 21:03 UTC, submitted by fran
Linux "Lightweight Portable Security (LPS), created by USA's Department of Defense, is a small Linux live CD focusing on privacy and security, for this reason, it boots from a CD and executes from RAM, providing a web browser, a file manager and some interesing tools. LPS-Public turns an untrusted system into a trusted network client." Complete with backdoor so they can spy on all of us I'm sure!1!!
Thread beginning with comment 482226
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: You feel it is not secure?
by Morgan on Tue 26th Jul 2011 07:11 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: You feel it is not secure?"
Member since:

Huh? I never said "all open source software would be better", nor do I feel that way, at least in the context you provide. My point was that open source software can be fully vetted, whereas proprietary binary software cannot. Therefore, in the context of this article, I feel there are some unavoidable security weak points due to the use of closed-source software.

As far as whether open source or proprietary software is a better choice for usability, that is left up to the particular user. My own experience has been that there are some applications that just don't have a superior F/OSS counterpart yet. Until there is a better open source version, I'm stuck using the proprietary one if I want full functionality. Thankfully, that is a rare condition.

EDIT: And my sleep deprived brain just realized what you actually meant, that for this particular distro, fully open source would be better but may not be feasible due to the very limitations I just blathered about above. Sorry about that!

I'm going to bed now; no more sleepy-posting I promise.

Edited 2011-07-26 07:14 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2