Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Jul 2011 22:27 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 482236
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Basically, they're losing the game
by libray on Tue 26th Jul 2011 16:38
in reply to "RE[2]: Basically, they're losing the game"
Yet, without a need for BES or BES Express to be added to Exchange, all the other phone providers are able to do activesync directly and those devices cost less per month.
I see your point about the lots of other features that are allowed to be set through BES(x). With standard activesync, there is remote wipe plus maybe only a handful of others. That could be enough to allow the CEO to whisper to the CTO to tell the CISO to rewrite the policy and allow the iPhones of the world on the network.
Edited 2011-07-26 16:43 UTC




Member since:
2009-04-02
There is already the BlackBerry Express server, which offers the most common features of BES for free. It also works on a BIS subscription.
Besides, most companies don't choose BES for the sync features only, but also for the strong encryption features, and the very detailed policy settings you can push to BB devices (I don't know how much exactly, but it seems there are over 100 different settings you can manage).