Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Jul 2011 21:14 UTC
Apple Petty Apple is petty. Amazon, Kobo, and others have changed their applications to conform to Apple's App Store rules, and if there's one word that describes the situation these booksellers are in, it's petty. Still, it's leading to good things: Kobo has announced it's going to bypass the App Store by writing an HTML5 e-reader for iOS (and thus, for other HTML5-capable mobile devices).
Thread beginning with comment 482296
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Business Process Patent
by fretinator on Tue 26th Jul 2011 21:36 UTC
fretinator
Member since:
2005-07-06

1. Dangle sparlkley items in front of customers.
2. Abuse customers.
3. Own the market

It's sounds wierd, but it seems to work. Unfortunately, prior art from the U.S. colonization may invalidate the patent.

Reply Score: 16

RE: Business Process Patent
by fmaxwell on Fri 29th Jul 2011 15:55 in reply to "Business Process Patent"
fmaxwell Member since:
2005-11-13

Apple didn't take anything away from me. They told the ebook sellers that there were to be no more sales which circumvented the app store, which they were doing in order to deprive Apple of their cut of the sales.

It's no different than the rules on ebay. You can't sell an item on ebay and then circumevent ebay when selling more items to the same customer.

Why is Apple always portrayed as the bad guy? For f***'s sake, they allowed competing vendors (Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Kobo, etc.) to to put their ebook apps on the iPad and now people are bitching because Apple wants a cut of the book sales? Do you see Amazon allowing Kindle owners to buy books directly from Apple's ebook store? Yeah, didn't think so.

So rather than Apple selling an ebook for $10, they get $3 when it's sold through one of their competitors. In return, the competitors get access to a huge market of iPad owners.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Business Process Patent
by fretinator on Fri 29th Jul 2011 16:53 in reply to "RE: Business Process Patent"
fretinator Member since:
2005-07-06

You are right, it's not as bad as it sounds. However, I think the issue is they tell EVERYBODY what they can and can't do. Users, here's all you can do. Developers, you can only do A, B, C. Vendors, you can only do this. The list of do's and don't they require from the whole ecosystem starts to get a little creepy. You start to think they have a bit of an over-inflated image of themselves. At some point, everyone might just move on to friendlier confines. But probably not. Doesn't mean we can't all whine about it!

I think the defining moment for me was when the first Mac Mini came out. You could choos a Combo Drive (DRD-Rom/ CDRW) or a Super Drive (DVDRW). Coming from the Windows world, I thought I might get the combo drive and later upgrade it to the Super Drive. Only that was not allowed. No one was allowed to upgrade it to a Super Drive. If a user, a 3rd-party, or even an Apple Store did so it voided the warranty. Instead, your only option was to sell yours and purchase one with a Super Drive. I thought line of reasoning was REALLY strange. I also felt the same about non-relaceable batteries in many of their devices. You had to pay someone to replace the battery for you - at a high premium. Wierd!!

Reply Parent Score: 2