Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Jul 2011 22:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 482564
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Apple can't compete on merit
by MOS6510 on Thu 28th Jul 2011 11:36
in reply to "RE[5]: Apple can't compete on merit"
RE[7]: Apple can't compete on merit
by Laurence on Thu 28th Jul 2011 11:49
in reply to "RE[6]: Apple can't compete on merit"
Android is a lot simpler to use than a Blackberry so I'm really not sure what that article is on about.
However, even that aside, it doesn't really prove your point. All it says is return rates are close to 40% on some phones. Well I'd expect that on the low end crap that people buy thinking they're getting a "$100 iPhone". In that respect budget Android handsets /are/ mis-sold.
However I'd be more interested in the return rates of the middle to top end Android handsets - the ones that do directly compete with (and often even pull ahead of) Apple's iPhone. I bet those return rates are significantly lower.
RE[7]: Apple can't compete on merit
by aldo on Thu 28th Jul 2011 16:48
in reply to "RE[6]: Apple can't compete on merit"
From the article:
"However, on the ground, many return rates are approaching 40% said a person familiar with handset sales for multiple manufacturers."
That is just laugh-out-loud pathetic. A "person familiar with handset sales for multiple manufacturers" is not a source - it's someone that was invented for the purposes of the article. What you've linked to is not evidence that Android is worse than iPhone - it's more evidence that Apple is terrified of Android.





Member since:
2005-06-29
[citation needed]