Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Jul 2011 22:09 UTC
Legal Two different graphs. Both happen to be published at Ars Technica, with one of them coming from a different source. Seemingly completely unrelated, but when you ponder the waterfall of recent lawsuit-related news, these two graphs suddenly tell all there is to tell. These two innocent little graphs illustrate why Apple is attacking Android so ferociously.
Thread beginning with comment 482647
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Alfman
Member since:
2011-01-28

lucas_maximus,

"These markets would have still been niche if Apple had not entered them and dominated them."

Hypothetically, why exactly do you think consumer tablets would not have occurred without apple?


It seems to be the direction we were headed in anyways, with the technological advancements of lower power cpus, better battery life, all round lower costs, much cheaper data plans, the time seemed ripe for tablets to become popular. I really wanted a tablet nearly a decade ago, but I baulked at the prices at the time. I am positive that I wasn't alone. In my opinion price has always been the main barrier to mass adoption. We just needed to wait for moores law to kick in and put them at price points consumers were comfortable with.

Edited 2011-07-29 00:41 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

Hypothetically, why exactly do you think consumer tablets would not have occurred without apple?


Because many other companies tend to "design by commitee" ... whereas Apple don't.

I not saying it definetely wouldn't have happened, however other companies don't do the combination of Design, Marketing and Simplicity of use and don't create a Buzz ...

Apple devices for the most part have a good synergy of form and function. Even on my quite old iBook ... nice little things like having the USB ports in the right place ... make all the difference.

Edited 2011-07-29 06:06 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

Alfman Member since:
2011-01-28

lucas_maximus,

"Because many other companies tend to 'design by commitee' ... whereas Apple don't."

I'm not really sure what you mean here. Do you have examples? My impression that apple is one of the most bureaucratic and controlling employers in existence, though I could be wrong.


No one entity in the world is so important that the world couldn't get by without them. This is a good thing.

I say as long as there's healthy competition, then consumers will be able to find what they want at competitive prices.

Reply Parent Score: 2