Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Jul 2011 21:14 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 482754
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Not surprising, really!
by Laurence on Fri 29th Jul 2011 20:31
in reply to "RE[2]: Not surprising, really!"
The Kindle came out three years before the iPad and you think that Amazon should sue Apple? For what? Making a more appealing product -- something that can do more than just display books in greyscale?
I couldn't think of anything worse than buying an iPad as an eBook reader:
* a backlit LCD would is a horrible strain on the eyes compared to the Kindles eInk.
* a glass screen is a nightmare to read from in bright light where as the Kindles matted display is perfect.
* the battery life on the Kindle runs circles around the iPad.
Sure the iPad is a better multi-functional device than the Kindle, but then the Kindle was never meant to be a tablet PC. However if you're comparing like for like then the iPad is a much worse eBook reader than the Kindle.
RE[4]: Not surprising, really!
by fmaxwell on Fri 29th Jul 2011 20:43
in reply to "RE[3]: Not surprising, really!"
I couldn't think of anything worse than buying an iPad as an eBook reader:
* a backlit LCD would is a horrible strain on the eyes compared to the Kindles eInk.
* a backlit LCD would is a horrible strain on the eyes compared to the Kindles eInk.
Studies have shown no evidence to support that claim.
* a glass screen is a nightmare to read from in bright light where as the Kindles matted display is perfect.
And the Kindle's display is unreadable in a dark bedroom, which is where I often read at night before going to sleep.
* the battery life on the Kindle runs circles around the iPad.
My house has electricity. I have a charger that works in my car and on my boat. Not an issue for me.
However if you're comparing like for like then the iPad is a much worse eBook reader than the Kindle.
Much of what I read is either technical books with color photos and illustrations, or full color magazines about the hobbies that interest me. The Kindle is worthless for either of those activities, which is why I had no e-reader prior to the iPad. Not everyone's reading it Tom Clancy fiction or romance novels.





Member since:
2005-11-13
The Kindle came out three years before the iPad and you think that Amazon should sue Apple? For what? Making a more appealing product -- something that can do more than just display books in greyscale?