Linked by David Adams on Wed 3rd Aug 2011 16:10 UTC, submitted by Sin2x
Thread beginning with comment 483350
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Its anecdotal I know, but with desktop effects turned off kde 4.7 runs just fine on my whimpy little atom netbook. So its certainly possible to run on slower hardware as long as you don't go overboard on the desktop effects. I think the problem is more, certain hardware is buggy as hell with kwin, rather than kwin just being a hog in general.
Gnome 3 of course won't run at all.
Gnome 3 of course won't run at all.
Why not? Most atom netbooks have Intel GMA graphics, which is perfectly capable of running gnome 3. Do you have something else?
Why not? Most atom netbooks have Intel GMA graphics, which is perfectly capable of running gnome 3. Do you have something else?
Its an eeepc 1000HE, and when testing on a fedora live usb, its either 1) does work and I get a black screen 2) Boots into fallback mode 3) boots into gnome shell but its buggy and pretty much unusable. The uncertainty alone is enough to keep me from using it.
Edited 2011-08-03 20:27 UTC





Member since:
2009-09-17
Its anecdotal I know, but with desktop effects turned off kde 4.7 runs just fine on my whimpy little atom netbook. So its certainly possible to run on slower hardware as long as you don't go overboard on the desktop effects. I think the problem is more, certain hardware is buggy as hell with kwin, rather than kwin just being a hog in general.
Gnome 3 of course won't run at all.
If kde ever gets too much for me I shall probably drop down to xfce like everyone else seems to be doing. Though I might take to detour through Awesome first to see if I could get used to a tiling WM.