Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 4th Aug 2011 21:38 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y The Google-Microsoft patent war of words is continuing. Yesterday, Google (rightfully so, in my book) accused Apple, Microsoft, and Oracle partaking in an organised patent attack against Android, instead of competing on merit, claiming that they bought up Novell's and Nortel's patents solely to attack Android and its device makers. Microsoft struck back, claiming Google was offered to join in on the bids for the Novell patents, but rejected the offer. Google has now responded to this accusation - and to make matters even more confusing, Microsoft responded back. A public shouting match between two powerful parties? Count me in!
Thread beginning with comment 483767
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
TechGeek
Member since:
2006-01-14

Thom has argued that software patents are merely "patenting numbers" and that it is wrong based on this assertion.

I think C. S. Lewis, JRR Tolken, JK Rowling among many others would disagree with that understanding. Thom's philosophy is akin to saying that patenting a book is just patenting letters.


If you are going to attack someone at least bother to get the argument right. Thom argued that software is "math" not numbers. Although technically both is actually correct. Software is converted to binary, ones and zeroes. Software works at the core level by your processor doing simple math. If you had EVER programmed in assembly, you would clearly understand how the math works.

Reply Parent Score: 5