Linked by David Adams on Fri 5th Aug 2011 16:38 UTC, submitted by tjavailable
Thread beginning with comment 483904
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
What really annoys me is that flash uses so much cpu on osx compared to windows or even linux (with vdpau). I'm not sure that this particular problem can be attributed to adobe though.
H264 videos on osx (the ones that VDA deems acceptable) all seem to use more cpu than DXVA or VDPAU.
What really annoys me is that flash uses so much cpu on osx compared to windows or even linux (with vdpau). I'm not sure that this particular problem can be attributed to adobe though.
H264 videos on osx (the ones that VDA deems acceptable) all seem to use more cpu than DXVA or VDPAU.
H264 videos on osx (the ones that VDA deems acceptable) all seem to use more cpu than DXVA or VDPAU.
For me Snow Leopard and 10.3 enabled me to play YouTube videos with around 5% CPU utilisation but in all honesty that was the only thing I used it for but I've since removed it and started using ClickToPlugin and ClickToFlash which pretty much allows me not to have Flash installed. I'd venture to argue that the problem with Flash is years of legacy and an unwillingness to do something about the underling problems with it - at the end of the day Lightspark (http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/lightspark) has made great progress which tells me the underlying concept of Flash isn't the problem but the implementation. At the end of the day if a one man bad (with a few helpers) can produce a pretty good partial replacement for Flash then I expect a lot better from professional programmers whose bread and butter is programming and get paid for their craft.
RE[5]: Comment by kaiwai
by d-signet on Mon 8th Aug 2011 08:57
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by kaiwai"




Member since:
2005-07-06
All in all, I think I'm a little disappointed with lion. Leopard worked fine for me, I probably shouldn't have upgraded. Now that I see the future of os x I'm not so sure I'll be sticking with apple through the next os x release.
Instead of geting emotional about the situation how about reading blogs about the situation:
http://obamapacman.com/2011/07/adobe-caught-with-pants-down-5-month...
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/905/cpsid_90508.html#main_Flash_Player
And there are many more out there. Adobe has already made it clear on their website that they know Flash utilises more CPU under Lion than Snow Leopard. It is NOT a Lion fault, it is a fault with Flash.
Btw, if you're sitting at 68 Degrees Celsisus then there is definately something wrong with your setup because even my old 13.3inch 2.53Ghz Core 2 would be sitting at around 40-50 Degrees Celsius sitting idle.
Edited 2011-08-06 02:21 UTC